Positivo A1600R / A1700R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 5%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPositivo A1600R / A1700R  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo A1600R / A1700R
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '22 at 18:37
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Memory 2.59
1-Core 8.1
2-Core 15.5
4% 8.73 Pts
4-Core 22.9
8-Core 25.6
3% 24.2 Pts
64-Core 25.1
2% 25.1 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(1297 2058) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7212
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 2.2
2% 1.83 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2
Splatting 3
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 73 100 94 87 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 94.4
Write 133
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 88
65% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.4
141% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
TI9D3S05H41160 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 479
8% 479 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A1600R / A1700R Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo A1600R / A1700R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback