MSI MS-1591

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive417% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star Summit E16Flip A11UCT
MotherboardMSI MS-1591  (all builds)
Memory15.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJan 26 '22 at 10:27
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1195G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 63.1
1-Core 158
2-Core 257
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 478
52% 413 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
MSI(1462 1300) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6660
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
6.9% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 7.3
8% 8.2 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 6
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 6.9%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
812GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2530 2658 2944 2741 3151 1896 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
417% Outstanding
Read 3,454
Write 3,024
Mixed 2,272
SusWrite 2,653
640% 2,851 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 73.8
242% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,066
DQ Write 783
DQ Mixed 862
661% 903 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 417%
Great: 521%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HCNNNFAMMLXR-NEE 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 52.2
MC Mixed 42.6
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 15.4
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1591 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-1591

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback