Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive18.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A58M-S1  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140612
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 26 '22 at 07:05
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4000 APU-$171
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 47.8
2-Core 66
41% 60.4 Pts
4-Core 68.6
8-Core 65.9
9% 67.2 Pts
64-Core 70.3
4% 70.3 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 250
Gigabyte(1458 22CA) 2GB
CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
7.85% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 16.8
8% 13.6 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 8.1
7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.85%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 8.7 73 1.1 6.5 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.1% Very poor
Read 124
Write 92.5
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 34.1
18% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 8
35% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 10.5
DQ Write 16.6
DQ Mixed 11.2
9% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
447GB free
Firmware: CC6B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 116 124 123 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 112
Write 99.9
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 120
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EWB4GB681PAE- Samsung M378B5773CH0- 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.7% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 6.5
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.3
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A58M-S1 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback