Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180920
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 21:53
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 227
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 451
60% 448 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
PNY(196E 1329) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.7% Very good
Lighting 97.4
Reflection 96.4
Parallax 89.9
79% 94.6 fps
MRender 98
Gravity 90.2
Splatting 78.3
72% 88.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 289 397 444 451 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 438
Write 452
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 317
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 6.5
61% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 17.1
14% 20.6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55%
Great: 91%
Team TM8PS7256G 256GB
133GB free
Firmware: U0115A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 74 69 64 51 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 490
Write 440
Mixed 400
SusWrite 80.2
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 22.7
139% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 0.9
55% 131 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 100%
StoreJet Transcend 750GB
284GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 36 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 25.5
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 37.1
38% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 89F2 GR26C16S8K2HU416 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 21
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 21.6
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback