Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock N68C-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121031
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '22 at 19:48
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 460-$150 1,087 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	46% Average	Memory 65.5 1-Core 53.6 2-Core 108 46% 75.6 Pts	4-Core 154 8-Core 157 21% 156 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420 9,903 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1B0A 9083) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.73 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.51% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 0.6 2% 2.27 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 0.1 1% 1.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.51% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480 480GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 269GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 70 3.8 20 22 3.2 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.5% Poor	Read 205 Write 152 Mixed 118 SusWrite 41.1 29% 129 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 20.3 4K Mixed 10.2 42% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 19.1 DQ Write 27.5 DQ Mixed 17.8 15% 21.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 52%
WD WD3200AVCS-632DY1 320GB 268 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 106GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 79 80 79 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 55.9 Write 59.8 Mixed 46 SusWrite 78.4 44% 60 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 50%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 32GB 4,096 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 21GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 5.6 6.8 6 6.4 6.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	4.03% Terrible	Read 7 Write 8.2 Mixed 6 SusWrite 5.8 9% 6.75 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 25% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.03% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C11 1x4GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM 800 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	25.6% Poor	MC Read 11 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 8 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	21x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	17x
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	11x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	9x
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	8x
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x
0 500GBCt500mx5Bench 92%, 2,476 samples	3x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	4x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $118

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16