Fujitsu FMVU02006

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu FMVU02006  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB286
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 11:33
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 54.3
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 62
37% 56 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 124
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 80.9
5% 80.9 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 1897) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 4
Splatting 6.2
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.12%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HXY 256G 256GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 309 336 340 355 350 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 323
Write 328
Mixed 314
SusWrite 326
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 22.9
87% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 33.5
67% 132 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 92%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 19 19 19 19 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 103
Write 13.7
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 18.3
30% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 146
28% 146 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FMVU02006 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu FMVU02006

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback