Lenovo 20KS001RUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20KS001RUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20KS001RUK
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 03:51
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 220
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 458
50% 395 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 5069) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9749
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.59% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 6.4
6% 10.4 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 8.7
6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
641GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1104 1039 1011 1156 1087 930 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,279
Write 1,170
Mixed 1,109
SusWrite 1,054
260% 1,153 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 70.9
244% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 618
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 557
413% 549 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 215%
Great: 410%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
106GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 55 14 15 15 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 76.7
Write 78
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 29.3
46% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
194% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 8A45 CL18-20-20 D4-3200 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 22
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 21.4
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20KS001RUK Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20KS001RUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback