Venturer WT9L11

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemVenturer WT9L11  (all builds)
MotherboardVenturer ONA19TB005
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 20:40
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 41.6
1-Core 61
2-Core 117
41% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 235
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Device(1DC2 4502) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
2.64% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 3.5
3% 2.9 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.64%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SD Card 126GB
104GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 24.9
Write 27.6
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 27.8
36% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.2
88% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
25.2% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 10.2
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WT9L11 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Venturer WT9L11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback