Novatech BB-7670016

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNovatech BB-7670016  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Z170XP-SLI-CF
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 17:56
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 224
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 635
63% 516 Pts
64-Core 630
39% 630 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 134
Parallax 127
102% 129 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 130
Splatting 114
97% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 100%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$99
494GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 402 387 401 414 397 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 418
Write 400
Mixed 278
SusWrite 396
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 40.5
143% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 299
242% 343 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 137%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
24GB free
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 153 72 68 61 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 390
Write 216
Mixed 287
SusWrite 109
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 27.8
115% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 179
158% 234 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 87%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
81GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 259 258 258 255 255 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 404
Write 255
Mixed 257
SusWrite 256
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 28.4
108% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 195
161% 230 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76%
Great: 123%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
616GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 126 126 126 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 110
Write 68.9
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 125
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
463GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 71 61 60 49 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 111
Write 59.9
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 61.9
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 22.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 23.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BB-7670016 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: Novatech BB-7670016

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback