Asus P5QPL-VM EPU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5QPL-VM EPU  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 16:15
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5300-$59
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Memory 49.4
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 82.2
35% 57.6 Pts
4-Core 81.2
8-Core 73
10% 77.1 Pts
64-Core 71.8
4% 71.8 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
EVGA(3842 C805) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.33% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 2.6
9% 8.43 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 3.8
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.33%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.2.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 103 101 86 100 100 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 124
Write 108
Mixed 129
SusWrite 95.7
26% 114 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 23.7
76% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 74.8
DQ Mixed 30.1
29% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST360021A 60GB-$50
53GB free
Firmware: 3.19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 37 33 36 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 39
Write 36.9
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 35.9
26% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4
13% 4.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5QPL-VM EPU Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QPL-VM EPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback