Panasonic CF-52VACBYDE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPanasonic CF-52VACBYDE  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF52-5
Memory4.7 GB free of 8.01562 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130326
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 09:13
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594
IC4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 81.2
2-Core 136
56% 95 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 225
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7700M
Device(10F7 8338) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 10.6
6% 9.7 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 7.4
6% 7.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTGAN102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 102 85 84 84 78 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.4% Average
Read 212
Write 144
Mixed 226
SusWrite 90.3
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 27.3
77% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 157
115% 152 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 859B CT51264BF1339.C16F 56GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-52VACBYDE Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-52VACBYDE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $819
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback