Asus P11C-X Series

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus P11C-X Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P11C-X Series
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '22 at 01:45
Run Duration	254 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2136 360 User benchmarks, average bench 90% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 86.1 1-Core 126 2-Core 251 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 796 75% 623 Pts	64-Core 1,017 63% 1,017 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.8% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 108 Parallax 109 90% 109 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 99.9 Splatting 91 87% 108 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GB 3,806 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXH7101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 219 219 214 211 210 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	162% Outstanding	Read 1,103 Write 822 Mixed 699 SusWrite 218 158% 710 MB/s	4K Read 52.1 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 69 222% 75 MB/s	DQ Read 1,008 DQ Write 570 DQ Mixed 363 384% 647 MB/s
Poor: 132% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 261%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 525GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 154 150 155 154 155 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 154 Write 148 Mixed 104 SusWrite 153 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905701-020.A00G 1x16GB 305 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.2% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 13.7 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 16.8 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P11C-X Series Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Asus P11C-X Series

CPU
Xeon E-2224IntelBench 86%, 284 samples	2x
0000IntelBench 92%, 16 samples	2x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $285Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 24%, 8,041 samples	2x
Quadro K2000DNvidiaBench 8%, 1,102 samples	2x
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	2x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	2x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	2x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsungBench 239%, 34,988 samples	1x

RAM
BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 4x16GBCrucialBench 83%, 234 samples	2x
M391A2K43BB1-CTD 4x16GBSamsungBench 104%, 120 samples	2x
W-MEM2666E4D88G 2x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 2 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16