Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Positivo POS-PIQ67CG (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo POS-PIQ67CG
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120730
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '22 at 14:55
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 75.4 1-Core 70.6 2-Core 122 55% 89.5 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 206 28% 206 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Device(7377 0000) 2GB CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Lighting 17.4 Reflection 21.7 Parallax 16.1 14% 18.4 fps	MRender 16 Gravity 20.9 Splatting 18.7 15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 120GB 3,248 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0422C SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 106 55 57 55 55 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 456 Write 395 Mixed 360 SusWrite 89.8 73% 325 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 35.6 121% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 228 191% 274 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 87%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 148GB free Firmware: 100001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 80 80 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 128 Write 136 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 79.6 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 162% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 79%
Ut163 USB2FlashStorage 1GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 1GB free, PID 0163 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	2.63% Terrible	Read 9 Write 2 Mixed 3.2 SusWrite 2.2 4% 4.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.63% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston termiter 8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.8 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 89.6 45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	18x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	17x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	2x

SSD
SKC600256G 256GBKingstonBench 102%, 6,756 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBCrucial $40Bench 171%, 6,626 samples	3x

RAM
termiter 8GBKingstonBench 51%, 34 samples	13x
termiter 8GBKingstonBench 50%, 12 samples	9x
76.B146G.C340C 2x4GBUnknownBench 46%, 100 samples	5x

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16