Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79-UD3  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 10:46
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 196
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 503
53% 422 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.09
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 138
Parallax 126
98% 128 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 109
Splatting 118
107% 133 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 910 275 564 564 559 562 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 2359
Write 831
Mixed 1,248
SusWrite 572
276% 1,253 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 75.5
249% 84.4 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 442
DQ Mixed 501
380% 515 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 230%
Great: 293%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
606GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1786 1638 1641 1638 1637 1587 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,456
Write 2,079
Mixed 1,694
SusWrite 1,654
442% 1,971 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 78.2
256% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 661
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 546
414% 560 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 304%
Great: 431%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
372GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 91 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 126
Write 119
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 89.8
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 171 171 171 172 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 112
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 171
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.6
311% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 110%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
371GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 162 163 163 161 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 134
Write 112
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 162
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.6
311% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 41
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 14.3
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 102%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X79-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $573
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback