Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200529
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '22 at 22:13
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77 3,540 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 76.7 1-Core 47.4 2-Core 121 50% 81.6 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 256 33% 247 Pts	64-Core 408 25% 408 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% HP(103C 82FC) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.08 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.6% Above average	Lighting 61.8 Reflection 61.9 Parallax 60.1 50% 61.3 fps	MRender 64.7 Gravity 64.9 Splatting 59.2 51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team TM8PS7256G 256GB 5,014 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 55 63 52 57 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 412 Write 49.9 Mixed 58.9 SusWrite 50.9 31% 143 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 22.3 4K Mixed 1.6 37% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 78.7 DQ Write 3.1 DQ Mixed 0.2 10% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 100%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB 270 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 787GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.3 7.2 7.5 7.7 7.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	3.1% Terrible	Read 8 Write 6.7 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 7.4 10% 7.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 3.1% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2K70DM0- 1x16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 6 17% 6.07 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 86.9 46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	339x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	269x
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples	144x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	126x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	114x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	108x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	64x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	45x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	35x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	62x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16