HP p6750de

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP p6750de  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120105
Uptime5 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 19:00
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 94.9
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 139
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 360
39% 311 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
MSI(1462 2312) 3GB
CLim: 594 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.53% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 4.9
4% 6 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 5.5
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.53%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 207 218 218 220 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.3% Above average
Read 226
Write 108
Mixed 173
SusWrite 219
41% 181 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 20.1
70% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 152
124% 177 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
895GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 86 86 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 78.9
Write 81
Mixed 66
SusWrite 86
58% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
37.1% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6750de Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6750de

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback