Asrock H110M-I

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-I  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151019
Uptime21.1 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 12:03
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4500-$37
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 216
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 218
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
ASRock(1849 1912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.32% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 3
Parallax 6.6
5% 5.23 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 10.2
6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.32%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 62 76 90 87 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 440
Write 416
Mixed 330
SusWrite 99.5
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 38.1
133% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 179
176% 280 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 91%
Clover CD502HJ 500GB
459GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 133 140 139 141 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 123
Write 38.5
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 136
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 9.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-I Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback