Acer Predator PO3-600

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	89.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Predator PO3-600 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator PO3-600(DCH)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200408
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '22 at 23:30
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$243 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Memory 89.7 1-Core 139 2-Core 279 93% 169 Pts	4-Core 562 8-Core 1,094 98% 828 Pts	64-Core 1,090 67% 1,090 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Sapphire(174B A520) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.7% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 104 Parallax 107 92% 108 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 98 Splatting 89.6 86% 108 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 26,870 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80002C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 358 359 329 320 339 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	155% Outstanding	Read 1,074 Write 761 Mixed 840 SusWrite 346 168% 755 MB/s	4K Read 42.3 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 58.4 197% 69.9 MB/s	DQ Read 567 DQ Write 753 DQ Mixed 620 479% 647 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 153%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 78 75 72 69 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 183 Write 156 Mixed 25.6 SusWrite 72 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	MC Read 34.4 MC Write 34.7 MC Mixed 24.1 89% 31.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 24.1 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PO3-600 Builds (Compare 2,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 78%

Battleship

System: Acer Predator PO3-600

CPU
Core i7-9700Intel $243Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	904x
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	703x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	581x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	489x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	440x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	393x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	515x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	325x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	167x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	498x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	315x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 1,446 samples	197x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $532

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16