Biostar H81MHV3L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H81MHV3L  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141216
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 23:25
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 223
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 584
59% 476 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 19.3
15% 18.6 fps
MRender 16.4
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 16.9
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 480GB SSD 480GB
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07373
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 382 430 423 428 418 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 457
Mixed 418
SusWrite 362
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 48.1
179% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 302
220% 283 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
185GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 109 108 108 110 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 99.2
Write 92.7
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 108
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HUS724030ALA640 3TB
153GB free
Firmware: MF8OAC50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 94 96 97 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 97.2
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 95.5
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 94%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB
89GB free
Firmware: MK7OA870
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 146 141 144 144 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
65% Good
Read 83.5
Write 79.7
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 143
64% 88 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
70GB free
Firmware: MJAOA3M0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 100 104 105 106 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 159
Write 154
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 107
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81MHV3L Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H81MHV3L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback