Acer AOHAPPY2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive14.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer AOHAPPY2  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE06_PT
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 20:21
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N570
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Memory 26
1-Core 6.2
2-Core 11.2
11% 14.5 Pts
4-Core 18.5
8-Core 19.7
3% 19.1 Pts
64-Core 19.2
1% 19.2 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 26%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200Hf10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 28 27 27 28 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.5% Very poor
Read 201
Write 28.1
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 27
17% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 3.5
16% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 484D54333235533642465238432D483920 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
8.47% Terrible
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.97 GB/s
SC Read 1.1
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 1.1
4% 1.5 GB/s
Latency 280
14% 280 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.47%
Great: 10%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback