Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemWortmann_ag TERRA_PC  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte B85M-HD3G
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130808
Uptime44.9 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 16:43
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 93
2-Core 152
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 258
35% 259 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 63%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 120GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0312A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 396 383 314 385 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
64% Good
Read 402
Write 330
Mixed 329
SusWrite 332
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 14.1
65% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 95.4
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 37.7
71% 135 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TERRA_PC Builds (Compare 2,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback