Asrock B360 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics170% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B360 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory116.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 16:24
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$285
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 77.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 285
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 988
94% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,527
94% 1,527 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
170% Outstanding
Lighting 238
Reflection 208
Parallax 250
194% 232 fps
MRender 263
Gravity 238
Splatting 166
176% 222 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 170%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SMI DISK 512GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 158 209 39 133 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 503
Write 434
Mixed 407
SusWrite 151
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 0.6
88% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 9.5
DQ Mixed 0.7
27% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
130GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 344 385 426 456 465 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 474
Mixed 392
SusWrite 397
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 56.3
187% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 346
261% 350 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
5TB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 199 202 197 202 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 127
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 198
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
WD Re 2TB-$35
2TB free
Firmware: 00.0NS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 135 135 136 135 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 154
Write 133
Mixed 102
SusWrite 133
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3800C18-32GTZN 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.5% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.2
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 23.9
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B360 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback