Koloe X58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Intel Thurley
Motherboard	Koloe X58 (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190731
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '22 at 10:37
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 66 2-Core 133 58% 93.8 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 326 36% 287 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180 23,273 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3532) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 16.3 Reflection 23 Parallax 15.6 13% 18.3 fps	MRender 24.8 Gravity 17.8 Splatting 16.3 16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 401GB free (System drive) Firmware: GH2OA560 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 27 62 53 63 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 96.3 Write 72.8 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 58.3 45% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 72%
SAMSUNG HD400LD 400GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 64GB free, PID 6830 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 25 25 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 26.1 Write 24.3 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 24.4 32% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MXIC 25L8005 41GB 466 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 4266, 33 MHz 8192, 33792 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.9% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 5.3 17% 5.97 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 6.6 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 508 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

CPU
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	88x
Xeon X5660IntelBench 71%, 6,950 samples	78x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	31x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	30x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	17x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x

RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples	193x
MXIC 25L8005 37GBUnknownBench 37%, 309 samples	88x
25L8005 1x33GBMXICBench 23%, 218 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16