MSI H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C13
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13)  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 07:00
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 238
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 369
51% 377 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 2340 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.4% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 53.7
48% 58.5 fps
MRender 50.6
Gravity 54.6
Splatting 50.2
42% 51.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS120G2G0A- 120GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE220400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,474
Write 44.2
Mixed 90.4
1,339% 1,870 MB/s
4K Read 692
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.6
29,287% 233 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 153%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
822GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 169 170 167 168 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 169
Mixed 109
SusWrite 168
116% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 11.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13) Builds (Compare 881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback