Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 207 User benchmarks, average bench 19% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Memory 14 1-Core 38.2 2-Core 59.3 20% 37.2 Pts	4-Core 81.9 8-Core 80.4 11% 81.2 Pts	64-Core 71.9 4% 71.9 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0100 2782) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6813 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.23% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.2 1% 1.37 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.23% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast 128GB NA850-2280 128GB 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN06201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 153 163 158 164 177 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.1% Above average	Read 215 Write 207 Mixed 203 SusWrite 167 45% 198 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 29.3 99% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 116 88% 120 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 0.8 10% 3.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 368 11% 368 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 19%, 207 samples	12x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	4x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	12x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	4x

SSD
128GB NA850-2280 128GBTeclastBench 70%, 1 sample	12x
128GB NS550-2242 128GBTeclastBench 45%, 331 samples	4x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	12x
123456789012345678 4x1.5GBABCDBench 24%, 1,884 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16