Notebook P375SM-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemNotebook P375SM-A  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo P375SM-A
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 00:34
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4940MX
U40, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 221
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 505
54% 427 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M
Clevo(1558 0376) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
65.4% Good
Lighting 94.7
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 51.2
77% 67.9 fps
MRender 56.7
Gravity 53.8
Splatting 47
42% 52.5 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$50
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 356 348 350 255 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 484
Mixed 437
SusWrite 306
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 66.8
224% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 268
227% 332 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 125%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G 1315 BLS8G3N169ES4.16FE KHX1600C9S3L/8G 1315 BLS8G3N18AES4.16FE 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 19.1
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 21
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P375SM-A Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Notebook P375SM-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback