HP Pavilion Wave Desktop 600-a0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Wave Desktop 600-a0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C9
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '22 at 22:07
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 154
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 303
41% 307 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 81C9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 6.3
4% 6.17 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVPV128HDGM-000H1 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW74H0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,342
Write 502
Mixed 475
168% 773 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 45.2
174% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 984
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 263
273% 471 MB/s
Poor: 122% Great: 196%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
392GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 108 108 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 148
Write 130
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 106
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 029E CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
67.9% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 18.6
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Wave Desktop 600-a0xx Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Wave Desktop 600-a0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback