EVGA 132-YW-E178-FTW

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	EVGA__ 132-YW-E178-FTW
Motherboard	EVGA 132-YW-E178-FTW (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080630
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '22 at 21:14
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Memory 80.5 1-Core 31.2 2-Core 62.4 41% 58 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 124 17% 125 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250 11,945 User benchmarks, average bench 7% EVGA(3842 1255) 896MB Ram: 896MB, Driver: 260.89 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.58% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 3.2 1% 3.17 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 2.6 3% 4.33 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 1.58% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 24 0GB SSD 19 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 121 186 185 185 182 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.7% Average	Read 233 Write 89.3 Mixed 114 SusWrite 157 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 23.1 92% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 65.5 DQ Write 52.6 DQ Mixed 56.2 43% 58.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 84%
Mknssdcl 120GB-DX 120GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 107GB free Firmware: 524A SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 90 89 95 92 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 126 Write 101 Mixed 107 SusWrite 90 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 46.9 4K Mixed 25.8 86% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 2.9 DQ Write 56.3 DQ Mixed 30.7 24% 30 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 58%
Memorex USB Flash Drive 64GB 563 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 39GB free, PID 7722 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 0.8 5.1 9.3 9.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 27.5 Write 14.2 SusWrite 6.4 17% 16 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 67% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DRAM Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 4.5 14% 4.77 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 132-YW-E178-FTW Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: EVGA 132-YW-E178-FTW

CPU
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	2x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	1x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	1x

SSD
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	2x
S120GG2 120GBSandiskBench 48%, 2 samples	1x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	5x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16