Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q572

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemFujitsu STYLISTIC Q572  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBC01
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '14 at 14:29
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Z-60 APU
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 13.9
2-Core 26.5
9% 20.2 Pts
4-Core 26.8
8-Core 25.9
4% 26.3 Pts
64-Core 26.7
2% 26.7 Pts
Poor: 15% Great: 22%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250M
Fujitsu(10CF 179B) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.1.9003
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.81
0% 0.83 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.13
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS064G3AMNM-101 64GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11700A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36% Below average
Read 346
Write 135
Mixed 188
49% 223 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 7.47
44% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 28.3
DQ Mixed 6.54
9% 17.2 MB/s
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback