Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87-HD3  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140117
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 20 '22 at 15:56
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 180
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 321
39% 297 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 22FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 65.1
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 88.3
53% 71.8 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 70
Splatting 45
47% 59.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 350
Write 180
Mixed 146
49% 225 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 20.9
98% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 110
86% 118 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
521GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 149 150 152 147 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 154
Write 149
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 151
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 1866 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.3% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H87-HD3 Builds (Compare 857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback