Positivo CI581128TBSEFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo CI581128TBSEFI  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo NB50TH
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '22 at 12:02
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$237
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 94
2-Core 188
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 745
64% 551 Pts
64-Core 725
45% 725 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 55A1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 8.6
5% 8.17 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 10.8
8% 9.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Clevo(1558 55A1) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 39.6
Parallax 39.1
29% 38.1 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 26.4
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB421D58 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 652 651 114 527 733 405 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 2,317
Write 294
Mixed 186
SusWrite 514
178% 828 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 44.6
151% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 950
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 272
288% 498 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 198%
Great: 291%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
320GB free
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 419 423 387 412 415 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 416
Write 350
Mixed 304
SusWrite 409
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 18
90% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 84.5
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 27.1
58% 115 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 100%
Im2p33f3 NVMe ADATA 256GB
171GB free
Firmware: 92004281 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 814 749 579 558 396 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,600
Write 871
Mixed 803
SusWrite 537
211% 953 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 24.5
131% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 787
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 462
359% 507 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 159%
Great: 173%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 29.1
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 22.6
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CI581128TBSEFI Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Positivo CI581128TBSEFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback