MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200411
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '22 at 08:53
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 80.2
1-Core 145
2-Core 287
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 1,056
96% 806 Pts
64-Core 2,171
134% 2,171 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
MSI(1462 3230) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1774 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.9% Very good
Lighting 96.1
Reflection 119
Parallax 113
78% 110 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 97.2
Splatting 94.4
80% 98.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
565GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1636 1559 1409 1429 1362 1432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,593
Write 2,091
Mixed 1,779
SusWrite 1,471
444% 1,984 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 64
214% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,000
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 192
233% 434 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 285%
Great: 410%
Intel SSDPEKNW010T9 1TB
896GB free
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1242 1231 1221 1251 1192 1201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,690
Write 1,156
Mixed 1,056
SusWrite 1,223
287% 1,281 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 53.7
194% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 861
DQ Write 96.4
DQ Mixed 183
209% 380 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 223%
Great: 295%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
350GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 424 420 431 411 414 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 422
Mixed 380
SusWrite 421
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 38.8
132% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 76
DQ Mixed 149
110% 149 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 148 156 159 151 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 98.5
Write 112
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 152
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.7
241% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 90%
Initio INIC-3609 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 3940
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 231 228 226 229 241 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
169% Outstanding
Read 246
Write 235
Mixed 227
SusWrite 230
319% 234 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 23.6
1,745% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 42.7
DQ Mixed 30.2
2,568% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 169%
Great: 176%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 45.6
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 38.9
117% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 38
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 110%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $942
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback