Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101116
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 20 '22 at 06:41
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 97.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 214
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 642
65% 528 Pts
64-Core 801
50% 801 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro S7000
AMD(1002 0310) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.Q2.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.8% Average
Lighting 53.5
Reflection 58.4
Parallax 71.7
44% 61.2 fps
MRender 49.3
Gravity 52.6
Splatting 41.1
38% 47.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 27%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 73 76 75 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 255
Write 79.1
Mixed 119
SusWrite 74.2
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 32.1
119% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 34.6
DQ Write 73.8
DQ Mixed 39.6
34% 49.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
390GB free
Firmware: MS2OA810
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 240 237 236 242 227 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 218
Write 211
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 237
128% 177 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
166% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 130%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 46.6
86% 46.6 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback