Asus V-P7H55E

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus V-P7H55E (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK V-P7H55E
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100716
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '17 at 20:59
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3460 780 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 93.9 1-Core 83.8 2-Core 162 69% 113 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 377 43% 337 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Zotac(19DA 5215) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.98% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 2.96 Parallax 1.22 2% 2.2 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 2.13 2% 2.44 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.98% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9279 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3978 (B1) Unknown 96 96 42 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 53 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 318 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13480269472
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Sandisk U110 32GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 0GB free Firmware: U221000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4103 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1732 (A5) Unknown 100 100 153676 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 38 (AE) Unknown 100 100 226 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 37 227634053157 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 126 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 63 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1651782693 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1176073040	25.8% Poor	Read 239 Write 90 Mixed 131 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 12.7 4K Mixed 7.58 32% 10.1 MB/s	DQ Read 35.9 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 7.55 10% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 40%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 455GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 176 6066 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4739 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10579 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4458 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 327 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 161 161 119643 (C2) HDA temperature 118 108 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.9% Average	Read 86.1 Write 83.8 Mixed 83.6 64% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.27 93% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 84%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 111GB free Firmware: JP2OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 98 (03) Spinup time 115 115 17192911048 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6715 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 15355 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 6221 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6719 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6719 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 223339413539 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 500	52.4% Above average	Read 92.3 Write 90.3 Mixed 95 70% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.34 84% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 74%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 4GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 8.35 Mixed 10.8 17% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.89 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.28 58% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	41.4% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 12.1 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 12.3 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 60.1 67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical V-P7H55E Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Asus V-P7H55E

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	16x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	11x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	8x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	5x

SSD
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	3x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	27x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	15x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16