HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10  (all builds)
MotherboardHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 11:53
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron X3216 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.7% Terrible
Memory 5.77
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 54.7
16% 31.4 Pts
4-Core 54.5
8-Core 59.7
8% 57.1 Pts
64-Core 54.2
3% 54.2 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 7.7%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
AMD(1002 1871) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 3.9
2% 3.43 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 177 183 191 144 194 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.8% Average
Read 247
Write 191
Mixed 196
SusWrite 175
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 18.6
56% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 98.6
DQ Mixed 111
87% 121 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 445
9% 445 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback