Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E5X-U01RU
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120614
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '22 at 09:01
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	MDA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Memory 73.4 1-Core 85.9 2-Core 144 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 211 28% 212 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.37% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 2.9 3% 3.9 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 5.1 3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.37% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM02.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 397 436 399 416 406 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 436 Write 433 Mixed 259 SusWrite 406 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 21.7 46% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 182 180% 286 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 111%
SAMSUNG HM641JI 640GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 36GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 27.1 Write 15.3 Mixed 24.1 SusWrite 27.4 31% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GB 26,681 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	53.4% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 16.8 54% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 93.8 43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	348x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	152x
Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples	93x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	503x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	247x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	200x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GBAdataBench 30%, 1,080 samples	71x
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	24x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16