Fujitsu MS-7350VP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Fujitsu MS-7350VP (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU MS-7350VP
Memory	6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 8
BIOS Date	20070529
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '22 at 05:38
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$20 11,349 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Memory 80.1 1-Core 30 2-Core 60.4 40% 56.8 Pts	4-Core 59.6 8-Core 60.4 8% 60 Pts	64-Core 60.8 4% 60.8 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5570 (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20) 22 User benchmarks, average bench 5% XFX(1682 3050) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	4.7% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 6.7 Parallax 5 5% 5.83 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 6.4 5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.7% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HCS725025VLAT80 250GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: V5DOA46A SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 49 50 49 23 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 55.5 Write 56.7 Mixed 34.9 SusWrite 42.9 35% 47.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 33%
Seagate ST1000VM 002-1CT162 1TB 576 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 932GB free Firmware: SC23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 45 45 48 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 134 Write 126 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 50.5 68% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 93%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38 10,520 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 380GB free Firmware: 3.AE SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 42 43 42 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 66 Write 51.1 Mixed 40.1 SusWrite 38.8 36% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 42%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 25GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 7.2 5.5 4.9 3.5 5.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	6.41% Terrible	Read 31 Write 3.3 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 5 11% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.41% Great: 32%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 9GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.4 6.3 4.3 7 6.9 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 7.2 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 5.6 12% 12.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 3 172% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM SDRAM Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5.3 17% 6.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7350VP Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Fujitsu MS-7350VP

CPU
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $20Bench 37%, 11,349 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 5570 (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)ATIBench 5%, 22 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $20

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Fujitsu MS-7350VP

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Fujitsu MS-7350VP

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)