Asrock X99X Killer/3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics170% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory52 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 19:25
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 713
68% 562 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
EVGA(3842 3883) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
170% Outstanding
Lighting 235
Reflection 212
Parallax 266
192% 238 fps
MRender 297
Gravity 217
Splatting 167
179% 227 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 170%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,052
Write 5,434
Mixed 5,696
1,278% 5,728 MB/s
4K Read 389
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 248
1,007% 276 MB/s
DQ Read 874
DQ Write 522
DQ Mixed 621
483% 673 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76
62GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,496
Write 2,318
Mixed 1,884
497% 2,233 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 82.3
276% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 811
DQ Write 593
DQ Mixed 701
524% 702 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 6TB
755GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 231 228 223 221 216 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 305
Write 298
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 224
166% 229 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 152%
Great: 293%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
410GB free
Firmware: CV22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 149 149 147 147 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 92.5
Write 84.9
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 147
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
313GB free
Firmware: CV22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 113 112 113 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 120
Write 113
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 112
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 45.6
MC Write 48.3
MC Mixed 43.7
131% 45.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 23.8
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 117%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $555
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback