HP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 805A
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 16:51
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A6-8550B R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4G
XU1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 49.1
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 99
43% 72 Pts
4-Core 99.1
8-Core 100
13% 99.8 Pts
64-Core 98.8
6% 98.8 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
HP(103C 2B4E) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 8.3
6% 6.9 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7TB3Q-128G-1006 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 282 287 294 307 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 328
Write 226
Mixed 213
SusWrite 292
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 20.1
92% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 130
123% 193 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-017.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback