Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop TP412FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive326% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop TP412FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP412FA
Memory15.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 09:31
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 131
2-Core 162
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 398
44% 347 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 19D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 803 1354 1834 1937 1788 1968 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 2,449
Write 2,001
Mixed 150
SusWrite 1614
345% 1,553 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 81.5
276% 98.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,263
DQ Write 689
DQ Mixed 650
571% 867 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 326%
Great: 370%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 859B CT16G4SFRA266.C8FB 20GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
67.6% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 20
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 19.8
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop TP412FA Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop TP412FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback