Lenovo 2347A49

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 2347A49  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2347A49
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180605
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 07:33
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 27.4
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 116
38% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 168
21% 161 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 112 91 91 96 76 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.7% Poor
Read 236
Write 204
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 114
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 9.1
26% 7.17 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 103%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
106GB free
Firmware: LE1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 107 97 151 127 166 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.5% Poor
Read 146
Write 117
Mixed 162
SusWrite 130
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 6.9
24% 7.83 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 42.4
DQ Mixed 22.7
20% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
25.5% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.5
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.5
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 270
15% 270 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2347A49 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2347A49

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback