Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock G43Twins-FullHD (all builds)
Memory	6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090921
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '22 at 20:41
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38 10,428 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.45 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Memory 71.6 1-Core 39.4 2-Core 78.7 42% 63.2 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 159 21% 159 Pts	64-Core 158 10% 158 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 858E) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.28% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 5.6 Parallax 1.3 3% 3.6 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.3 4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.28% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB 30,897 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 83GB free Firmware: UI450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 55 27 56 56 54 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.1% Below average	Read 239 Write 205 Mixed 183 SusWrite 50.6 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 20.9 68% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 20.2 DQ Write 27.7 DQ Mixed 22.1 17% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 52%
Seagate ST3160812AS Q 160GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 43GB free Firmware: 3.BQK SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 55 27 56 56 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Read 54.4 Write 56.2 Mixed 40.4 SusWrite 50.6 37% 50.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 40%
WD WD1200JD-00HBC0 120GB 1,007 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 08.02D08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 50 37 51 51 50 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 49.2 Write 53.3 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 46.5 32% 44.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.9% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.63 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 5.2 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 97.8 41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples	2x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x
G45/G43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 1%, 6,554 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6770AMDBench 10%, 16,639 samples	1x

SSD
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GBWDCBench 43%, 30,897 samples	2x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $161

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16