HP 700-270jp

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP 700-270jp (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '22 at 19:37
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 119 2-Core 231 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 532 57% 452 Pts	64-Core 531 33% 531 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 2AF3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.96% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 7.5 4% 5.1 fps	MRender 8.4 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 5.3 4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.96% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK512MBF 512GB 918 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 441 436 427 439 433 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 390 Write 412 Mixed 296 SusWrite 434 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 33.5 121% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 160 148% 222 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 104%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 58GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 91 89 90 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 92.5 Write 87.9 Mixed 63.1 SusWrite 89.4 61% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5474-013.A00LF Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.9% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 15.7 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 22.9 SC Mixed 19.4 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700-270jp Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP 700-270jp

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	4x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	3x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	10x

SSD
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK512MBF 512GBBench 80%, 918 samples	5x
256GB 256GBXstarBench 68%, 246 samples	2x

RAM
99P5474-013.A00LF Micron 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 10GBKingstonBench 48%, 4 samples	4x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	2x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $114

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16