Asus X99-M WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-M WS  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '17 at 06:37
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 238
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 916
84% 705 Pts
64-Core 1,277
79% 1,277 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.7% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 141
Parallax 122
104% 130 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 124
Splatting 104
92% 113 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6 Pro 512GB-$249
477GB free
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 480
Mixed 467
108% 485 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 35.8
128% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 109
135% 238 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$200
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,884
Write 869
Mixed 886
266% 1,213 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 39.8
157% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 102
114% 195 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 187%
Great: 237%
Plextor M6 Pro 512GB-$249
82GB free
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 470
Mixed 464
107% 480 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 35.5
134% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 102
125% 223 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Plextor M6e PCIe M.2 128GB-$190
62GB free
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 670
Write 326
Mixed 430
105% 475 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 28.2
97% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 78.5
100% 179 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 87%
Great: 116%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
764GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 124
Write 101
Mixed 105
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.18
78% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
663GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 91.4
Write 80.4
Mixed 75.2
62% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.25
79% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G4D32BEEAK.K8FB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 58.6
MC Mixed 46.1
149% 52.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 21.6
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 132%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-M WS Builds (Compare 150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback