Lenovo Lenovo Erazer x315

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo Lenovo Erazer x315  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 0x369F17AA
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 16:52
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 54.3
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 115
44% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 189
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.09.04.02
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.8% Average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 83.9
51% 69.7 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 46.9
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
192GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 387 379 383 381 385 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 402
Mixed 396
SusWrite 384
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 43.3
145% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 230
172% 230 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97%
Great: 129%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 122 112 120 138 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 163
Write 160
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 128
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030MN68F9F1600 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.5% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10.7
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Lenovo Erazer x315 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo Lenovo Erazer x315

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback