Gigabyte GA-EX38-DS5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX38-DS5  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 15:31
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 43.8
2-Core 95.4
45% 70.5 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 176
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 43.6
Parallax 35.6
30% 38.6 fps
MRender 46.8
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 25.6
29% 36.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vi550 S3 SSD 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 175 138 54 57 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39% Below average
Read 181
Write 142
Mixed 152
SusWrite 104
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 21.2
78% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.1
DQ Write 42.4
DQ Mixed 25.3
22% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 39%
Great: 103%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 1TB-$50
764GB free
Firmware: VC22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 118 124 125 124 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 160
Write 124
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 118
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
20% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX38-DS5 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX38-DS5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback