Hasee N9x0TD_TF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHasee N9x0TD_TF  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N9x0TD_TF
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190423
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 09:44
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 285
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 1,054
96% 808 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 951D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.9% Outstanding
Lighting 111
Reflection 113
Parallax 129
91% 118 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 109
Splatting 98.8
100% 126 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180S3256GJ 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 76 72 5.3 30 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26% Poor
Read 412
Write 217
Mixed 241
SusWrite 63.6
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 1.2
12% 6.4 MB/s
DQ Read 83.7
DQ Write 22.8
DQ Mixed 36.4
31% 47.6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 26%
Great: 85%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
726GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 118 121 119 121 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 134
Write 105
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 118
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.8
201% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 24.5
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 26.8
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N9x0TD_TF Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

System: Hasee N9x0TD_TF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback