HP Compaq dx7300 Microtower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq dx7300 Microtower  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A50h
Memory4.3 GB free of 6.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110817
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 08:59
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 3.00GHz-$98
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 55
1-Core 21.8
2-Core 22
26% 32.9 Pts
4-Core 45
8-Core 45.9
6% 45.5 Pts
64-Core 37.7
2% 37.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.08
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.7
4% 4.4 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3300820AS 300GB
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 49 54 63 59 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 76.3
Write 64
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 54
42% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 39GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.7% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.87 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dx7300 Microtower Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP Compaq dx7300 Microtower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $480
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback