| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 4.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung 300E5K/300E5Q (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NT300E5Q-LD54 |
| Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170807 |
| Uptime | 2.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 17 '22 at 06:41 |
| Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
53%
Above average
|
59% 99.2 Pts
|
28% 206 Pts
|
13% 209 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
|
4.47%
Terrible
|
4% 4.53 fps
|
6% 6.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Liteon CV3-8D128 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T872004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 130 99 119 129 110 MB/s
|
45.4%
Average
|
49% 216 MB/s
|
53% 23 MB/s
|
118% 202 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
466GB free
Firmware: AM003F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 111 111 111 111 MB/s
|
61.8%
Good
|
64% 87.7 MB/s
|
115% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
51.8%
Above average
|
53% 18.4 GB/s
|
44% 15.2 GB/s
|
40% 99.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E5K/300E5Q Builds (Compare 119 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E5K/300E5Q
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples | 57x |
| Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples | 39x |
| Core i7-5500UIntelBench 46%, 73,655 samples | 12x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples | 100x |
| HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 3,725 samples | 11x |
| GeForce 910MNvidiaBench 4%, 133 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $28 |