Shenzhen AERO 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemShenzhen AERO 3  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 02:30
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8279U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 167
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 375
42% 332 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Device(1E50 800C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
9.79% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 13.5
9% 11.5 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 12.7
11% 13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tigo 256GB 256GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111C0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 719 806 449 424 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,271
Write 931
Mixed 696
SusWrite 507
190% 851 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 26.5
163% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 733
DQ Write 641
DQ Mixed 428
392% 601 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 160%
Great: 166%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Tigo-2666Mhz-8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.6% Very good
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 13.8
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AERO 3 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Shenzhen AERO 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback